Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04154
Original file (BC 2014 04154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04154

						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect his retired pay as $755.00 
per month, effective 30 Mar 97, versus $672.00 per month.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

There was a mistake in his initial retirement computation and he 
should have received $755.00 a month instead of $672.00 a month.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

According to the applicant’s DD Form 4, Enlistment Record – 
Armed Forces of the United States, on 20 May 59, he enlisted in 
the Air Force Reserve.

According to Reserve Order EK-0057, dated 2 Oct 92, the 
applicant was relieved of his assignment as a member of the Air 
Force Reserve and, on 31 Dec 92, was transferred to the Retired 
Reserve in the grade of Senior Master Sergeant (SMSgt, E-8) to 
await retired pay at age 60.  

According to Reserve Order EK-5764, dated 12 Jul 93, the 
previous Reserve Order EK-0057 relating to the applicant’s 
31 Dec 92 retirement was rescinded and his effective retirement 
date was changed to 12 Mar 93, to await retired pay upon 
attaining age 60 (30 Mar 97).


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

DFAS-JBJE/CL recommends denial.  The applicant’s retired pay 
entitlement beginning on 30 Mar 97 is correct.  On 14 Jul 14, 
the applicant was provided a Reserve Retired Pay Calculation 
Worksheet indicating his gross monthly pay was $755.00.  Due to 
the applicant’s retirement date of 30 Mar 97, he received a 
retroactive payment in the gross amount of $25.17 for the month 
of Mar 97.  His gross pay was audited and verified to be 
correct.  Since the date of the applicant’s letter and audit 
worksheet, there has been an additional cost of living allowance 
of 1.7 percent, effective 1 Dec 14.  The applicant’s contention 
that he received $672.00 a month instead of $755.00 a month may 
have been due to withholdings from his monthly gross pay.  
Military retired pay is taxable and normally there is an amount 
withheld for Federal taxes which will reduce the gross pay.  The 
worksheet provided to the applicant reflects gross pay prior to 
any federal withholdings, not net pay which is the actual amount 
received.

The complete DFAS evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 3 Mar 15 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof that he has 
been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-04154 in Executive Session on 10 Jun 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	                   , Panel Chair
	                  , Member
	                        , Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-04154 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 6 Oct 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, DFAS/CL, dated 13 Feb 15, w/atch.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Mar 15.

						





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02212

    Original file (BC 2013 02212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10 USC §1407(c)(1), indicates retired pay is calculated based on the 36 month average for individuals who entered military service after 7 Sep 80; however, individuals who retired under §12731 are exempt from retired pay being calculated based on the high 36 month average. A complete copy of the DFAS-JBJE/CL evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was placed in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00776

    Original file (BC 2009 00776.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10 USC, Section 1174h requires SSB payments must be recouped from any future military retired pay by withholding a percentage of the retired pay until the gross amount is collected. On 25 November 2008, the applicant received notification from DFAS that her SSB would begin to be recouped from her monthly retired pay in the amount of $1,703.53 beginning with her pay check dated, 2 February 2009. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-02569

    Original file (BC-2008-02569.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record contains a copy of a 28 Apr 93 letter from DFAS-DE advising him, among other things, that the 12 Feb 93 open enrollment election he submitted was “invalid” because block 10 did not indicate the base amount upon which he wished to establish coverage. His open enrollment election form contained what appears to be the monthly SBP premium amount he thought would be collected from his retired pay if he elected coverage on a reduced level of retired pay. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02338

    Original file (BC 2014 02338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02338 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Recoupment of his Special Separation Benefit (SSB) from his military retired pay account be waived. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-CL recommends denial of the applicant’s request to have recoupment of his SSB from his military retired pay waived. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00140

    Original file (BC-2012-00140.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00140 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he elected his former spouse as beneficiary of his Survivor Benefit Program (SBP) based upon full retirement pay. The court ordered the applicant to provide SBP coverage on the former spouse’s behalf, but did not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01154

    Original file (BC 2014 01154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When she elected the RCSBP in 2000, she was informed she would only have to pay a premium for two years while her daughter was still under the age of 18. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-JBJE/CL recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00015

    Original file (BC-2005-00015.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The agreement also addressed that recoupment would occur if, and when, the applicant became eligible for retired pay, so the claims made by the applicant are clearly unfounded when he states that he did not know that his Reserve retired pay would be recouped for the SSB payment. AFPC/DPPRRP noted the applicant has requested an active duty retirement effective on his date of separation on 5 Jun 92. They stated the applicant did not have sufficient active service to request an active duty...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03521

    Original file (BC-2007-03521.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her application, the applicant submits her personal statement, a letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service – Cleveland Center (DFAS-CL), a letter from the Air Force Casualty Assistance office, a durable power of attorney, a letter from the annuity pay operations office, a verification for survivor annuity form (DD Form 2656- 7, a direct deposit sign up form, a withholding certificate for pension or annuity payments (W-4P), a claim for unpaid compensation of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703636

    Original file (9703636.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    'Panel Chair Attachment Ltr, AFPC/DPPTR, dtd 3 1 Mar 98 DEPARTMENT O F THE A I R FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCIDPPTR 550 C Street West St0 1 I Randolph AFB TX 781 50-471 3 SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records Requested Correction: The applicant is requesting corrective action to show he was not required to elect former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) when he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01269

    Original file (BC-2005-01269.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 01269 INDEX CODE: 137.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 OCTOBER 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to terminate his spouse only coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) retroactive to the date of his Civil Service (CS) retirement (24 May 1973). PL 92-425,...